i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 7735H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7735H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.08
+22.7%
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.29

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Core i5-12400F by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking468631
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.25
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency40.7817.89
Architecture codenameRembrandt-H Refresh (2023)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 April 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size208 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7735H 15.08
+22.7%
i5-12400F 12.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7735H 23950
+22.7%
i5-12400F 19518

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7735H 6438
i5-12400F 8389
+30.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 35222
i5-12400F 40690
+15.5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 7735H 12924
+8.7%
i5-12400F 11892

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 7735H 3.81
+7.1%
i5-12400F 4.08

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 21
+3.7%
i5-12400F 20

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7735H 1825
+3.8%
i5-12400F 1759

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 246
+0.8%
i5-12400F 244

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 2.91
i5-12400F 2.95
+1.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 10.6
+14%
i5-12400F 9.3

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 5997
i5-12400F 7816
+30.3%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 104
+2.3%
i5-12400F 101

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 252
i5-12400F 253
+0.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7735H 8582
i5-12400F 9517
+10.9%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 7735H 283
+5.2%
i5-12400F 269

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7735H 1564
i5-12400F 1742
+11.4%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 7735H 5621
+2.6%
i5-12400F 5476

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 7735H 52518
+16.6%
i5-12400F 45043

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7735H 293
+7.7%
i5-12400F 272

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 7735H 1607
i5-12400F 1762
+9.6%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 7735H 222
i5-12400F 235
+5.9%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 7735H 488
+13.5%
i5-12400F 430

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.08 12.29
Recency 1 April 2023 4 January 2022
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 7735H has a 22.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7735H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-12400F in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7735H is a notebook processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735H and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 255 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 14051 vote

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7735H or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.