Ryzen 3 3100 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.58
Ryzen 3 3100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
7.79
+70.1%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1326960
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.70
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Power efficiency27.8410.93
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size209.78 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 4.58
Ryzen 3 3100 7.79
+70.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 7009
Ryzen 3 3100 11928
+70.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 913
Ryzen 3 3100 1498
+64.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2632
Ryzen 3 3100 5125
+94.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 624
Ryzen 3 3100 991
+58.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142
Ryzen 3 3100 178
+25.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2824
Ryzen 3 3100 5005
+77.2%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 796
+63.5%
Ryzen 3 3100 486

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 863
Ryzen 3 3100 1135
+31.5%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 3474
Ryzen 3 3100 4602
+32.5%

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 16221
Ryzen 3 3100 27541
+69.8%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142
Ryzen 3 3100 209
+47.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.58 7.79
Recency 8 April 2019 24 April 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3100, on the other hand, has a 70.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 141 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1699 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U or Ryzen 3 3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.