Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Ryzen 3 3300X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3300X
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.45
+91.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.42

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8921327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency12.3027.89
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date24 April 2020 (4 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache96K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die size74 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3300X 8.45
+91.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 4.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3300X 13425
+91.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 7019

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3300X 1711
+86.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 916

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3300X 5938
+125%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2639

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 3300X 1071
+71.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 624

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 3300X 195
+37.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 3300X 5311
+88.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2824

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 3300X 449
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 796
+77%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 3300X 1296
+50.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 863

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 3300X 5329
+53.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 3474

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 3300X 30353
+87.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 16221

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 3 3300X 233
+64.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.45 4.42
Recency 24 April 2020 8 April 2019
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 3300X has a 91.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3300X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 3300X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Ryzen 3 3300X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1060 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 142 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3300X or Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.