E2-9000 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.72
+838%
E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.61

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11272786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency8.335.77
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G 5.72
+838%
E2-9000 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G 9092
+840%
E2-9000 967

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.72 0.61
Integrated graphics card 5.48 1.03
Recency 30 September 2019 1 June 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a 837.7% higher aggregate performance score, 432% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

E2-9000, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is a desktop processor while E2-9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 102 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 311 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.