Athlon 3000G vs E2-9000

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.63

Athlon 3000G outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27811667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD Athlon
Power efficiency5.747.63
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAAM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB?
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9000 0.63
Athlon 3000G 2.93
+365%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9000 967
Athlon 3000G 4482
+363%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 2.93
Integrated graphics card 1.03 2.98
Recency 1 June 2016 7 November 2019
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

E2-9000 has 250% lower power consumption.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 365.1% higher aggregate performance score, 189.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 311 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2061 vote

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9000 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.