Celeron 877 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1122not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency8.33no data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0DMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier3714
L1 cache384 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket AM4FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G 9093
+1214%
Celeron 877 692

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2019 1 July 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 877, on the other hand, has 282.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is a desktop processor while Celeron 877 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Celeron 877, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Intel Celeron 877
Celeron 877

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 102 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 17 votes

Rate Celeron 877 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G or Celeron 877, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.