i7-965 Extreme Edition vs Ryzen 5 8500G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 547 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7EE |
| Power efficiency | 19.93 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix2 (2024) | Nehalem (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 17 November 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 137 mm2 | 263 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 20,900 million | 731 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 24 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 14 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 17 November 2008 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Ryzen 5 8500G has an age advantage of 15 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 8500G is a notebook processor while Core i7-965 Extreme Edition is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8500G and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
