i7-965 Extreme Edition vs Celeron D 350
Primary details
Comparing Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7EE |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Nehalem (2008−2010) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 17 November 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 263 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 731 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 24 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 130 Watt |
Celeron D 350 has 78.1% lower power consumption.
i7-965 Extreme Edition, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 350 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
