Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 5 3600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
+204%
Microsoft SQ1
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 3000 Watt
3.67

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6931487
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Qualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiency16.260.12
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)2 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache32 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt3000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Qualcomm Adreno 685

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
+204%
Microsoft SQ1 3.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600 17746
+205%
Microsoft SQ1 5822

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.17 3.67
Recency 7 July 2019 2 October 2019
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 3000 Watt

Ryzen 5 3600 has a 204.4% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more threads, and 4515.4% lower power consumption.

Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 33.3% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Microsoft SQ1 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 17331 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.