Athlon 64 X2 4800+ vs Ryzen 5 2400G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.45
+1198%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.42

Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4800+ by a whopping 1198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11983023
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 52x Athlon 64 (Desktop)
Power efficiency7.980.61
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data1000 MHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache128K (per core)256K
L2 cache512K (per core)512K
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size210 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors4,950 million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4939
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1250 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 2400G 5.45
+1198%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2400G 8738
+1187%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 5 2400G 6672
+271%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 1798

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.45 0.42
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Ryzen 5 2400G has a 1197.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 2400G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1510 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 104 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 2400G and Athlon 64 X2 4800+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.