Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHz1000 MHz
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679
+0.6%
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 675

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 1798
+9.7%
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 1639

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Athlon 64 X2 4400+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Athlon 64 X2 4400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 140 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or Athlon 64 X2 4400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.