A10-7700K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.39
+117%
A10-7700K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.02

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms A10-7700K by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13371913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.25
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD A-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency6.392.01
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)14 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$152

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB4096 KB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VT
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.39
+117%
A10-7700K 2.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6980
+118%
A10-7700K 3205

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 2.02
Recency 30 September 2019 14 January 2014
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a 117.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7700K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-7700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD A10-7700K
A10-7700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 140 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 158 votes

Rate A10-7700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G or A10-7700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.