i5-7640X vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-7640X outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1337 | 1325 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.85 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Core i5 |
| Power efficiency | 6.39 | 3.74 |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Kaby Lake-X (2017) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (5 years ago) | 30 May 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $242 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 36 | 40 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | FCLGA2066 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 112 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| TSX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | HD 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.41 | 4.45 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 30 May 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 112 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 72.3% lower power consumption.
i5-7640X, on the other hand, has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Core i5-7640X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
