Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.25
+1114%
Athlon Neo X2 L325
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.35

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms Athlon Neo X2 L325 by a whopping 1114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13803062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 32x AMD Athlon Neo
Power efficiency6.181.84
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Congo (2009)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data1600 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4ASB1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technology
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR2
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 8no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.25
+1114%
Athlon Neo X2 L325 0.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6745
+1113%
Athlon Neo X2 L325 556

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 0.35
Recency 10 May 2018 10 September 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a 1114.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon Neo X2 L325, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo X2 L325 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while Athlon Neo X2 L325 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Neo X2 L325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Athlon Neo X2 L325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 88 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G or Athlon Neo X2 L325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.