Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs i3-9100F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.24
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.29
+1.2%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms Core i3-9100F by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13701358
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.87no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.176.25
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3635
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size126 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-9100F 4.24
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.29
+1.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-9100F 6733
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6819
+1.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 4.29
Recency 23 April 2019 10 May 2018

i3-9100F has an age advantage of 11 months.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, on the other hand, has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100F and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 7010 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 86 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-9100F or Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.