Athlon XP-M 1700+ vs Ryzen 3 7320U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1140 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 35.08 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 20 September 2022 (2 years ago) | 12 March 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $123 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.47 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 11 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 100 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP6 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 September 2022 | 12 March 2003 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen 3 7320U has an age advantage of 19 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 7320U and Athlon XP-M 1700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
