i3-N300 vs Ryzen 3 7320U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 7320U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.49
+3%
Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.33

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Core i3-N300 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11701184
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)no data
Power efficiency34.9272.66
Architecture codenameMendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date20 September 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm10 nm
Die size100 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes49

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 7320U 5.49
+3%
i3-N300 5.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 7320U 8799
+3%
i3-N300 8540

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 5.33
Integrated graphics card 2.89 3.30
Recency 20 September 2022 3 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

Ryzen 3 7320U has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

i3-N300, on the other hand, has 14.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, 100% more physical cores, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 7320U and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 750 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 79 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 7320U or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.