Apple M1 vs Ryzen 3 3200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.67

Apple M1 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12911174
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency6.54no data
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)no data
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography12 nm5 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,940 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.67
Apple M1 5.37
+15%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7129
Apple M1 8207
+15.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.67 5.37
Integrated graphics card 4.50 14.40
Recency 7 July 2019 10 November 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, 220% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3050 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2158 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.