Athlon X2 340 vs Ryzen 3 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
7.65
+811%
Athlon X2 340
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.84

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Athlon X2 340 by a whopping 811% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9622581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.70no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesMatisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)no data
Power efficiency10.931.20
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date24 April 2020 (4 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size74 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3100 7.65
+811%
Athlon X2 340 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3100 11928
+813%
Athlon X2 340 1307

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3100 1498
+399%
Athlon X2 340 300

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3100 5127
+1115%
Athlon X2 340 422

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.65 0.84
Recency 24 April 2020 2 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm

Ryzen 3 3100 has a 810.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3100 and Athlon X2 340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
AMD Athlon X2 340
Athlon X2 340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1701 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Athlon X2 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3100 or Athlon X2 340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.