Athlon II X2 270 vs Athlon X2 340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 340
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.82
Athlon II X2 270
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.82

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25972599
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.15
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.191.19
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96K128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2117 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 340 0.82
Athlon II X2 270 0.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 340 1310
+0.5%
Athlon II X2 270 1303

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X2 340 300
Athlon II X2 270 343
+14.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X2 340 422
Athlon II X2 270 591
+40%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 1 July 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Athlon X2 340 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 340 and Athlon II X2 270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 340
Athlon X2 340
AMD Athlon II X2 270
Athlon II X2 270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Athlon X2 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 237 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 340 or Athlon II X2 270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.