Ultra 7 258V vs Processor N95

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.15
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.41
+294%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1611614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency19.8769.09
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed0.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes94

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N95 3.15
Ultra 7 258V 12.41
+294%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N95 4783
Ultra 7 258V 9982
+109%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N95 13854
Ultra 7 258V 36479
+163%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Processor N95 5952
Ultra 7 258V 10693
+79.7%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Processor N95 6
Ultra 7 258V 20
+254%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N95 445
Ultra 7 258V 1593
+258%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N95 151
Ultra 7 258V 270
+78.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Processor N95 1.83
Ultra 7 258V 3.36
+83.6%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N95 2.7
Ultra 7 258V 7.6
+181%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Processor N95 2320
Ultra 7 258V 8536
+268%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N95 2566
Ultra 7 258V 9540
+272%

Blender(-)

Processor N95 1113
+198%
Ultra 7 258V 374

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Processor N95 999
Ultra 7 258V 1973
+97.4%

7-Zip Single

Processor N95 3803
Ultra 7 258V 5670
+49.1%

7-Zip

Processor N95 12177
Ultra 7 258V 34255
+181%

WebXPRT 3

Processor N95 178
Ultra 7 258V 270
+51.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.15 12.41
Recency 3 January 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

Processor N95 has 13.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has a 294% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N95 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N95 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N95
Processor N95
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 689 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 11 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N95 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.