Opteron 856 vs Pro A10-8700B
Primary details
Comparing Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2206 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD Carrizo | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.78 | no data |
Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Athens (2003−2006) |
Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | April 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 106 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
Socket | FP4 | 940 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 - 35 Watt | 92 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | AVX | - |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
RAID | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3/DDR3L-2133 | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 384 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 92 Watt |
Pro A10-8700B has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pro A10-8700B is a notebook processor while Opteron 856 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and Opteron 856, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.