Opteron 856 vs Opteron 848

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 848 and Opteron 856 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Server	Server
Architecture codename	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)	Athens (2003−2006)
Release date	November 2003 (21 year ago)	April 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 848 and Opteron 856 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	3 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	130 nm	90 nm
Die size	193 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	106 million	106 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 848 and Opteron 856 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	8	8
Socket	940	940
Power consumption (TDP)	89 Watt	92 Watt

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	130 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	89 Watt	92 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 848 and Opteron 856, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---