Celeron G6900E vs Pro A10-8700B

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency3.76no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP41700
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 710
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe version3.05.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pro A10-8700B 461
Celeron G6900E 1559
+238%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pro A10-8700B 992
Celeron G6900E 2815
+184%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2015 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 46 Watt

Pro A10-8700B has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 283.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pro A10-8700B is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A10-8700B
Pro A10-8700B
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 53 votes

Rate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A10-8700B or Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.