Celeron G6900E vs Phenom X4 9850 (95W)
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | October 2008 (16 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2+ | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 46 Watt |
Phenom X4 9850 (95W) has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 106.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9850 (95W) and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
