Mobile Sempron M140 vs Phenom X4 9650
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X4 9650 and Mobile Sempron M140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2399 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9650 and Mobile Sempron M140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9650 and Mobile Sempron M140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2+ | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Mobile Sempron M140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Mobile Sempron M140 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
Phenom X4 9650 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Mobile Sempron M140, on the other hand, has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9650 and Mobile Sempron M140. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom X4 9650 is a desktop processor while Mobile Sempron M140 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9650 and Mobile Sempron M140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
