Athlon X2 L310 vs Phenom X4 9600

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X4 9600
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.01
+381%
Athlon X2 L310
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 13 Watt
0.21

Phenom X4 9600 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by a whopping 381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24503213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.011.53
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Conesus (2009)
Release dateNovember 2007 (17 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size285 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors450 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2+BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X4 9600 1.01
+381%
Athlon X2 L310 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom X4 9600 1607
+388%
Athlon X2 L310 329

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom X4 9600 209
+80.2%
Athlon X2 L310 116

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom X4 9600 696
+250%
Athlon X2 L310 199

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 0.21
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 13 Watt

Phenom X4 9600 has a 381% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon X2 L310, on the other hand, has 630.8% lower power consumption.

The Phenom X4 9600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 L310 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom X4 9600 is a desktop processor while Athlon X2 L310 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9600
Phenom X4 9600
AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 12 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9600 or Athlon X2 L310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.