A4-3300 vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.62
+514%
A4-3300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.59

Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms A4-3300 by a whopping 514% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14962798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.740.86
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size346 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors904 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM1
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6410D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-3300.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 3.62
+514%
A4-3300 0.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+510%
A4-3300 942

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 0.59
Recency 7 December 2010 7 September 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Phenom II X6 1100T BE has a 513.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

A4-3300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
AMD A4-3300
A4-3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 457 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 116 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1100T BE or A4-3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.