Phenom II X4 P960 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X6 1035T outperforms Phenom II X4 P960 by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1978 | 2495 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.23 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | 4x AMD Phenom II |
| Power efficiency | 1.89 | 3.67 |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 27 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 19 October 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | S1 (S1g4) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0 |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.90 | 0.97 |
| Recency | 27 April 2010 | 19 October 2010 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
Phenom II X6 1035T has a 95.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Phenom II X4 P960, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 280% lower power consumption.
The Phenom II X6 1035T is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 P960 in performance tests.
Note that Phenom II X6 1035T is a desktop processor while Phenom II X4 P960 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1035T and Phenom II X4 P960, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
