FX-4130 vs Phenom II X6 1035T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1035T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
1.96
+11.4%

Phenom II X6 1035T outperforms FX-4130 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19592037
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.190.24
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.881.28
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date27 April 2010 (14 years ago)27 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189$112

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4130 has 26% better value for money than Phenom II X6 1035T.

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size346 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors904 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1035T 1.96
+11.4%
FX-4130 1.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1035T 3000
+11.3%
FX-4130 2696

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.96 1.76
Recency 27 April 2010 27 August 2012
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Phenom II X6 1035T has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

FX-4130, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Phenom II X6 1035T is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1035T and FX-4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Phenom II X6 1035T
AMD FX-4130
FX-4130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 107 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1035T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 173 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1035T or FX-4130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.