i5-9600KF vs Phenom II X4 B93

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 B93
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.36
Core i5-9600KF
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
6.75
+396%

Core i5-9600KF outperforms Phenom II X4 B93 by a whopping 396% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22321025
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency1.356.70
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache128 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size258 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors758 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 B93 1.36
i5-9600KF 6.75
+396%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 B93 2159
i5-9600KF 10677
+395%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 6.75
Recency 1 October 2009 7 January 2019
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

i5-9600KF has a 396.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-9600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 B93 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 B93 and Core i5-9600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 B93
Phenom II X4 B93
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Core i5-9600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 30 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 B93 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1150 votes

Rate Core i5-9600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 B93 or Core i5-9600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.