Atom N570 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2791not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.62no data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)1 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz666 MHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950
+179%
Atom N570 341

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 3000
+84.1%
Atom N570 1630

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 1350
+82.9%
Atom N570 738

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 1 March 2011
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 8 Watt

Atom N570 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Atom N570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Intel Atom N570
Atom N570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 131 vote

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1600 or Atom N570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.