A6-7310 vs Phenom II X4 960T BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2048 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
Power efficiency | no data | 6.40 |
Architecture codename | Zosma (2010−2011) | Carrizo-L (2015) |
Release date | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2048 KB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
Number of transistors | 904 million | 930 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | AM3 | FP4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3L-1866 |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2010 | 7 May 2015 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 12 Watt |
A6-7310 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 691.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 960T BE is a desktop processor while A6-7310 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 960T BE and A6-7310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.