Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs A6-7310

Aggregate performance score

A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69
+5.6%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.60

A6-7310 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20482090
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency6.401.21
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)7 November 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data258 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7310 1.69
+5.6%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 1.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7310 2689
+5.7%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 2544

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 1.60
Recency 7 May 2015 7 November 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 125 Watt

A6-7310 has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 941.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

Be aware that A6-7310 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7310 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7310
A6-7310
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 510 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 644 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7310 or Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.