Xeon 5148 vs Pentium N3520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3520
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.72
+26.3%
Xeon 5148
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 40 Watt
0.57

Pentium N3520 outperforms Xeon 5148 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26832807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.05
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency9.091.35
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$9

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.17 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz2.33 GHz
L1 cache224 KB0 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170771
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR2
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3520 0.72
+26.3%
Xeon 5148 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium N3520 1146
+25.7%
Xeon 5148 912

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.57
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 40 Watt

Pentium N3520 has a 26.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 471.4% lower power consumption.

The Pentium N3520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5148 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium N3520 is a notebook processor while Xeon 5148 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3520 and Xeon 5148, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3520
Pentium N3520
Intel Xeon 5148
Xeon 5148

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 82 votes

Rate Pentium N3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 5148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3520 or Xeon 5148, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.