Celeron M 370 vs Pentium N3520
Aggregate performance score
Pentium N3520 outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 380% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2685 | 3300 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 9.09 | 0.68 |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 December 2013 (10 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.72 | 0.15 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 21 Watt |
Pentium N3520 has a 380% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
The Pentium N3520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3520 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
