Celeron M 370 vs N2840

Place in the ranking	3043	3318
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Celeron M
Power efficiency	5.00	0.68
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date	22 May 2014 (10 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	2.16 GHz	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.58 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus rate	no data	400 MHz
L1 cache	56K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512K (per core)	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	22 nm	90 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCBGA1170	H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	no data	32 Bit
Smart Connect	+	no data
FSB parity	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.32 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.37	0.15
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	22 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	21 Watt

Celeron N2840 has a 146.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2840 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.