Celeron J1800 vs Pentium M 780
Aggregate performance score
Celeron J1800 outperforms Pentium M 780 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3169 | 3035 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | 3.41 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | 25 July 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.26V-1.404V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | - |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.24 | 0.36 |
| Recency | 25 July 2005 | 1 November 2013 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron J1800 has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 170% lower power consumption.
The Celeron J1800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 780 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 780 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
