FX-4350 vs Phenom II X4 910e

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 910e
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.35
FX-4350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
2.09
+54.8%

FX-4350 outperforms Phenom II X4 910e by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22421879
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.961.58
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date25 January 2010 (14 years ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$157no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size258 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors758 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 910e 1.35
FX-4350 2.09
+54.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 910e 2131
FX-4350 3314
+55.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 2.09
Recency 25 January 2010 29 April 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Phenom II X4 910e has 92.3% lower power consumption.

FX-4350, on the other hand, has a 54.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-4350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 910e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 910e and FX-4350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 910e
Phenom II X4 910e
AMD FX-4350
FX-4350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 26 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 910e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 546 votes

Rate FX-4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 910e or FX-4350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.