Ultra 7 164U vs Pentium M 765

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 765
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.22
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
9.19
+4077%

Core Ultra 7 164U outperforms Pentium M 765 by a whopping 4077% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3195837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency0.9996.64
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$448

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads114
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.8 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 9.19
Recency 20 October 2004 14 December 2023
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 14
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 9 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 164U, on the other hand, has a 4077.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

The Core Ultra 7 164U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 765 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.