VIA C3 Processor 1.0A vs Celeron 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Ezra-T (2002)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)3 June 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size77 mm256 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million16 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775370
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron 420 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

VIA C3 Processor 1.0A, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
VIA C3 Processor 1.0A
C3 Processor 1.0A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 169 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate VIA C3 Processor 1.0A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 420 or VIA C3 Processor 1.0A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.