Solo T1200 vs Pentium M 758
Aggregate performance score
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 758 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3290 | 3287 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 1.51 | 0.56 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | January 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 758 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 90 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 758 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 27 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 758 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 27 Watt |
Pentium M 758 has 170% lower power consumption.
Solo T1200, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium M 758 and Core Solo T1200.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 758 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
