i5-9400F vs Pentium M 735

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1096
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.07
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium MIntel Core i5
Power efficiencyno data8.68
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date10 May 2004 (20 years ago)8 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$182

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads16
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate400 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache32 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size87 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB-+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 735 1459
i5-9400F 6490
+345%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2004 8 January 2019
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 6
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium M 735 has 828.6% lower power consumption.

i5-9400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium M 735 is a notebook processor while Core i5-9400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and Core i5-9400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 56649 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or Core i5-9400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.