Ryzen 9 5900H vs Celeron M 560
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 569 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 7 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 7 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 560 has 50% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 5900H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
