Ryzen 9 5900H vs Celeron M 560
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 5900H outperforms Celeron M 560 by a whopping 3782% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3142 | 622 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | 27.13 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 7 January 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.33 | 12.81 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 7 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 560 has 50% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 5900H, on the other hand, has a 3781.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 560 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
