E1-1200 vs Pentium M 725

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 725
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18
E1-1200
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.24
+33.3%

E1-1200 outperforms Pentium M 725 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 725 and E1-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32683178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.811.26
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date23 June 2004 (20 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 725 and E1-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm40 nm
Die size87 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 725 and E1-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478FT1
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and E1-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 725 and E1-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and E1-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and E1-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon HD 7310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 725 0.18
E1-1200 0.24
+33.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 725 1400
+53.5%
E1-1200 912

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 725 684
E1-1200 874
+27.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 0.24
Recency 23 June 2004 6 June 2012
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 18 Watt

Pentium M 725 has 157.1% lower power consumption.

E1-1200, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The E1-1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 725 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 725 and E1-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 725
Pentium M 725
AMD E1-1200
E1-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Pentium M 725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 293 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 725 or E1-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.