Celeron M 383 vs Mobile Pentium 4 538
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 538 and Celeron M 383 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Pentium 4 | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Pentium 4 538 and Celeron M 383 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Pentium 4 538 and Celeron M 383 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 5 Watt |
Celeron M 383 has 1660% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Mobile Pentium 4 538 and Celeron M 383. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 538 and Celeron M 383, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
