Opteron 156 vs Pentium E5700
Primary details
Comparing Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2724 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | 0.99 | no data |
Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Venus (2004−2005) |
Release date | 8 August 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 May 2005 (19 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $110 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 82 mm2 | 115 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 228 million | 114 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA775 | 939 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 8 August 2010 | 4 May 2005 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 104 Watt |
Pentium E5700 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium E5700 is a desktop processor while Opteron 156 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5700 and Opteron 156, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.