EPYC 7443 vs Pentium E5800

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5800
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
EPYC 7443
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.63
+4781%

EPYC 7443 outperforms Pentium E5800 by a whopping 4781% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2667104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.3815.28
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.0616.86
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date28 November 2010 (13 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$68$2,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7443 has 184% better value for money than Pentium E5800.

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data28.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size82 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5800 0.73
EPYC 7443 35.63
+4781%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5800 1167
EPYC 7443 56601
+4750%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 35.63
Recency 28 November 2010 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Pentium E5800 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7443, on the other hand, has a 4780.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7443 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5800 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E5800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7443 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5800 and EPYC 7443, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5800
Pentium E5800
AMD EPYC 7443
EPYC 7443

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 403 votes

Rate Pentium E5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7443 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5800 or EPYC 7443, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.