E-350 vs Pentium D 820

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium D 820
2005
2 cores / 2 threads, 95 Watt
0.31
+14.8%

Pentium D 820 outperforms E-350 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 820 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30843132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium DAMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.311.42
Architecture codenameSmithfield (2005)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release dateMay 2005 (19 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 820 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache28 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm40 nm
Die size206 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °C90 °C
Number of transistors169 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 820 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPLGA775FT1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 820 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium D 820 and E-350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 820 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 820 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium D 820 0.31
+14.8%
E-350 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium D 820 499
+18.5%
E-350 421

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium D 820 1412
+38.3%
E-350 1021

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.27
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 18 Watt

Pentium D 820 has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score.

E-350, on the other hand, has a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 427.8% lower power consumption.

The Pentium D 820 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium D 820 is a desktop processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 820 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 820
Pentium D 820
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 171 vote

Rate Pentium D 820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium D 820 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.