Pentium D 940 vs E-350
Aggregate performance score
Pentium D 940 outperforms E-350 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E-350 and Pentium D 940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3132 | 3049 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.42 | 0.25 |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Presler (2005−2007) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 5 January 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $423 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
E-350 and Pentium D 940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 16 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 376 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.2V-1.3375V |
Compatibility
Information on E-350 and Pentium D 940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 | LGA775,PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Pentium D 940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
E-350 and Pentium D 940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Pentium D 940 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Pentium D 940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.27 | 0.35 |
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 5 January 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 130 Watt |
E-350 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 622.2% lower power consumption.
Pentium D 940, on the other hand, has a 29.6% higher aggregate performance score.
The Pentium D 940 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.
Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Pentium D 940 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Pentium D 940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
